Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Dialogical Practice during Group Work Presentations as a Means for Individual Group Work Assessment
University West, Department of Social and Behavioural Studies, Division for Educational Science and Languages.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1391-3346
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping (SWE).
2026 (English)In: Teaching and Learning 21st-Century Skills: Collaboration and Communication in Formal and Informal Educational Settings / [ed] Gillies, R.M., Singapore: Springer Nature, 2026, p. 13-31Chapter in book (Refereed)
Abstract [en]

This chapter is about teachers’ assessment of individual student’s knowledge and abilities in connection with students’ oral presentation of a mathematical group work assignment as a means for individual group work assessment. Thus, presenting a study about dialogical practices in four mathematical classrooms. The specific object is to show if, and if so, how classroom talk can create conditions for valid individual group work assessments. Participants were four teachers and 96 students in Year 5 (ages 11–12) and Year 8 (ages 14–15) in four compulsory schools in Sweden. Data consists of four video-recorded classroom talks after students’ presentations. Data has been analysed using an adapted version of the Cambridge Dialogue Analysis Scheme (CDAS) to code teachers’ and students’ dialogic and non-dialogic moves during classroom talk. The analysis shows that different communication patterns are created in the classrooms. The results display variations in dialogical practice in the four different schools, implying that teachers, to varying extents and in various ways, utilise the opportunity to ask questions to create dialogue. Based on these differences, we identified four types of classrooms, in which different teachers create different conditions for dialogical practice as a means for individual group work assessments.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Singapore: Springer Nature, 2026. p. 13-31
Keywords [en]
Remediate Classroom, Feedback Classroom, Elaborative Classroom, Reasoning Classroom
National Category
Educational Work
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-25412DOI: 10.1007/978-981-95-5997-8_2ISBN: 978-981-95-5996-1 (print)ISBN: 978-981-95-5997-8 (electronic)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-25412DiVA, id: diva2:2070107
Available from: 2026-06-11 Created: 2026-06-11 Last updated: 2026-06-11Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Forslund Frykedal, Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forslund Frykedal, Karin
By organisation
Division for Educational Science and Languages
Educational Work

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 21 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf