Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Opportunistic Drone Detection Using CommSense
Department of Electrical Engineering Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IND).
University West, Department of Engineering Science, Division of computer engineering and computer science.
Department of Electrical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Hyderabad (IND).
2025 (English)In: IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, Vol. 74, p. 1-15, article id 5501715Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The rapid proliferation of drones has introduced significant privacy and security challenges, making it essential to develop robust and efficient detection systems. Traditional methods often face tradeoffs in accuracy and environmental robustness. Integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) allows wireless devices to perform both data transmission/reception and sensing using the same hardware. In this article, we introduce the CommSense system, based on the application-specific instrumentation (ASIN) framework, which leverages existing communication signals without needing dedicated transmitters.

This makes CommSense a cost-effective, scalable, and regulation-free approach to drone detection. We first evaluated CommSense’s ability to detect environmental changes, achieving 97.7% accuracy in identifying scatterers (static objects). We then moved to a dynamic set-up and tested its performance in detecting a PixHawk drone in diverse environments—an academic building, lawn, parking lot, and playground—achieving good detection accuracies, ranging from 70% to 99.9% with varying distances. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis confirmed excellent performance, with AUC values exceeding 0.9 in most cases. We expanded our experiments by testing two more drones—DJI Mini 4 Pro and bigger PixHawk—at varying distances from 10 to 100 m.

The DJI Mini 4 Pro’s accuracy ranged from 99.7% at 10 m to 83.8% at 100 m, while PixHawk’s accuracy ranged from 100% to 81.9%. AUC values also dropped slightly as distance increased, confirming the expected performance variation with range. These results highlight the robustness of CommSense across different environments, drone models, and distances. Its advantages over traditional methods, like audio- and vision-based sensing, demonstrate CommSense’s potential as a practical solution to the growing security threats posed by widespread drone use.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2025. Vol. 74, p. 1-15, article id 5501715
Keywords [en]
Drones, Sensors, Accuracy, Radar, Radar tracking, Radar detection, Airborne radar, Acoustics, Feature extraction, Security
National Category
Computer Systems
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-23254DOI: 10.1109/TIM.2025.3545200ISI: 001442898800035Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-105001066410OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-23254DiVA, id: diva2:1965398
Available from: 2025-06-09 Created: 2025-06-09 Last updated: 2026-01-21Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Mishra, Amit Kumar

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Mishra, Amit Kumar
By organisation
Division of computer engineering and computer science
Computer Systems

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 39 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf