Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Quality of life-related and non-quality of life-related issues in ICU survivors and non-ICU-treated controls: a multi-group exploratory factor analysis
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg (SWE).
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg (SWE).
Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg (SWE).
Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala (SWE).
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Critical Care, ISSN 1364-8535, E-ISSN 1466-609X, Vol. 28, no 1Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: Quality of life (QoL) is a key outcome measure in healthcare. However, the heterogeneity in its definitions presents challenges in the objective evaluation of improvement. Universal questionnaires, tailored for a broad demographic group, inadequately represent the unique experiences of intensive care unit (ICU) survivors, including a lack of ability to discriminate issues related to QoL from issues that do not.

Methods: Using a 218-item, 13-domain provisional questionnaire, we assessed 395 adult ICU survivors, with a minimum 72-h stay at one of three Swedish university hospital ICUs, at 6 months to three years post-discharge. Their responses were compared to those of 195 controls, matched for age and sex and randomly recruited from the Swedish Population Registry. By multi-group exploratory factor analysis, we compared dimensionality in QoL perceptions between the two groups, emphasising patterns of correlation to 13 domain-specific QoL questions. Model fit was assessed using information criteria. Internal consistency reliability for each scale was determined using McDonald’s omega or Cronbach’s alpha. All analyses were conducted using Mplus, applying full information maximum likelihood to handle missing data.

Results: All domains except Cognition had a subset of questions correlating to the domain-specific QoL question in at least the ICU survivor group. The similarity between the two groups varied, with Physical health, Sexual health and Gastrointestinal (GI) functions mainly correlating the same issues to QoL in the two groups. In contrast, Fatigue, Pain, Mental health, activities of daily living, Sleep, Sensory functions and Work life showed considerable differences. In all, about one-fourth of the issues correlated to QoL in the ICU survivor group and about one-tenth of the issues in the control group.

Conclusions: We found most issues experienced by ICU survivors to be unrelated to quality of life. Our findings indicate that the consequences of post-ICU issues may play a more significant role in affecting QoL than the issues themselves; issues restricting and affecting social life and work life were more related to QoL in ICU survivors than in non-ICU-treated controls. Caution is advised before associating all post-ICU problems with an effect on quality of life. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
BioMed Central Ltd , 2024. Vol. 28, no 1
Keywords [en]
adult; aged; Article; cognition; controlled study; correlational study; daily life activity; demography; exploratory factor analysis; fatigue; female; groups by age; hospital discharge; human; intensive care unit; major clinical study; male; mental health; pain; perception; personal experience; quality of life; questionnaire; register; sex; sleep; survivor; university hospital
National Category
Nursing Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Research subject
NURSING AND PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE, Nursing science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-21446DOI: 10.1186/s13054-024-04890-7ISI: 001195340100001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85188932144OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-21446DiVA, id: diva2:1926185
Note

CC-BY 4.0

This study was financed by departmental resources and grants from Göteborgs Läkaresällskap, Hjärt- och Lungfonden, and ALF (LUA-ALF 74200).

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Ref# NCT02767180; Registered 28 April 2016.

Available from: 2025-01-10 Created: 2025-01-10 Last updated: 2025-09-30

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(1332 kB)51 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 1332 kBChecksum SHA-512
77ff42daaf51f3a8973db93920cf185bf31c8605bda1ca5092d6a2d4cd119872f1963e10e32c457a14b21f6f5f61c5c382ce7b2525851bddf9a0f25cad1ee056
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Johannesson, Elias

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Johannesson, Elias
By organisation
Division of Psychology, Pedagogy and Sociology
In the same journal
Critical Care
NursingAnesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 51 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 292 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf