Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Parenting Risk and Protective Factors in the Development of Conduct Problems in Seven Countries.
Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC (USA).
Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC (USA).
Center for Child and Family Policy, Duke University, Durham, NC (USA).
Department of Psychology, Ateneo de Manila University, Quezon City (PHL).
Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Prevention Science, ISSN 1389-4986, E-ISSN 1573-6695Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

This study advances the understanding of risk and protective factors in trajectories of conduct problems in adolescence in seven countries that differ widely on a number of sociodemographic factors as well as norms related to adolescent behavior. Youth- and parent-report data from 988 adolescents in seven countries (Colombia, Italy, Kenya, Philippines, Sweden, Thailand, and the USA) who were followed longitudinally from ages 10 to 18 (yielding 6872 total data points) were subject to latent class growth analysis. A 4-class model provided the best fit to the data: Late Starters, Alcohol Experimenters, Mid-Adolescent Starters, and Pervasive Risk Takers. The probability of membership in each class differed by country in ways that were generally consistent with country-specific norms and expectations regarding adolescent behavior. Positive parenting was associated with a lower likelihood of adolescents' membership in the Pervasive Risk Takers class, whereas psychological control, monitoring/behavioral control, and autonomy granting were associated with a higher likelihood of membership in the Pervasive Risk Takers class. Associations between parenting and membership in the other classes suggest that some risk taking during adolescence is normative even when parenting is positive.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024.
Keywords [en]
Conduct problems, Culture, Development, Parenting, Risky behavior
National Category
Applied Psychology Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Research subject
Child and Youth studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-22671DOI: 10.1007/s11121-024-01743-1ISI: 001349872000002PubMedID: 39508965Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85208782908OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-22671DiVA, id: diva2:1917498
Note

This research was funded by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development grant RO1-HD054805 and Fogarty International Center grant RO3-TW008141. This research also was supported by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) Grant P30 DA023026.

Available from: 2024-12-02 Created: 2024-12-02 Last updated: 2025-09-30Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textPubMedScopus

Authority records

Gurdal, SevtapSorbring, Emma

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Gurdal, SevtapSorbring, Emma
By organisation
Division for Educational Science and LanguagesDivision of Psychology, Pedagogy and Sociology
In the same journal
Prevention Science
Applied PsychologyPublic Health, Global Health and Social Medicine

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
pubmed
urn-nbn
Total: 93 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf