4243444546474845 of 99
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Revisiting the balanced inventory of desirable responding: Psychometric structure and personality correlates across heterogeneous groups
University West, Department of Social and Behavioural Studies, Division of Psychology, Pedagogy and Sociology.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-8562-5610
University West, Department of Social and Behavioural Studies.
University West, Department of Social and Behavioural Studies. Department of Social and Behavioral Studies, University West.
University West, Department of Social and Behavioural Studies.
Show others and affiliations
2026 (English)In: Frontiers in Psychology, E-ISSN 1664-1078, Vol. 17, article id 1788770Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Introduction: 

Socially desirable responding (SDR) encompasses both self-enhancing self-views and strategic self-presentation, yet debate persists regarding whether these tendencies reflect response distortion or substantive self-regulatory traits.

Methods: 

The dataset included 130 individuals (19 with medical In a heterogeneous sample of inmates, nurses, managers, and working adults, we examined the structure and personality correlates of the 16-item short form of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding (BIDR-6). Phase 1 evaluated dimensionality and item functioning using exploratory graph analysis, item response theory, differential item functioning, and confirmatory factor analysis.

Results: 

Results supported the theorized two-factor structure comprising Self-Deceptive Enhancement (SDE) and Impression Management (IM), with largely comparable structural patterns and minimal item bias across groups. Phase 2 examined construct validity within Big Five and HEXACO frameworks. SDE was associated with lower Neuroticism and higher Extraversion and Conscientiousness, whereas IM was positively related to Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Honesty–Humility and negatively related to Neuroticism. These associations were largely consistent across correctional and occupational contexts, although modest group differences emerged, particularly for IM.

Discussion/Conclusion: 

Overall, findings indicate that the BIDR-6 captures trait-linked self- and social-regulatory processes that generalize across diverse evaluative environments, supporting interpretations of SDR as more than mere response distortion.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Frontiers Media S.A., 2026. Vol. 17, article id 1788770
Keywords [en]
big five, differential item functioning, honesty–humility, impression management, personality processes, self-deceptive enhancement, self-regulation, socially desirable responding
National Category
Psychology (Excluding Applied Psychology)
Research subject
NURSING AND PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE, Nursing science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-25114DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1788770ISI: 001759224200001OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-25114DiVA, id: diva2:2064646
Note

CC-BY 4.0

Data collection among inmates was supported by a grant from the Scientific Committee at University West, Sweden. The study involving managers received funding for material preparation, data collection, and data management from the Municipal Academy West Fyrbodal, Sweden (Dnr 2017/900 B 60).

Available from: 2026-06-02 Created: 2026-06-02 Last updated: 2026-06-02

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(4398 kB)14 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 4398 kBChecksum SHA-512
981b10db640d1a79da207cf5320707773f4004f968322c28c3632eb363da9dac92f859b129cd49a2a37ceffd281b48781ae1390176581aa073f4d4b136940bdb
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records

Dåderman, Anna MariaPennbrant, Sandra

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Dåderman, Anna MariaPennbrant, Sandra
By organisation
Division of Psychology, Pedagogy and SociologyDepartment of Social and Behavioural StudiesSection for nursing - undergraduate level
In the same journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Psychology (Excluding Applied Psychology)

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 248 hits
4243444546474845 of 99
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf