Introduction
The purpose of preschool has changed from being a place where children stayed while their parents or caregivers were gainfully employed elsewhere to being a place where children are expected to spend part of their day, irrespective of the parents’ or caregivers’ employment status. Public preschool is generally available from the age of three. In Sweden, Denmark and Norway as well in Finland is preschool a key aspect of the welfare system and all children, from the age of one, have access to preschool (Eurydike, 2019; European Education and Culture Executive Agency, 2025).
Children’s agency is a right recognised to all children. Children have the right to participate in planned teaching that is based on their previous experience. Such participation should involve the children in the teaching, enable them to influence it, and allow them to learn from and with each other (Sheridan & Williams, 2018b). The leadership role of preschool teachers includes leading teams of colleagues as well as groups of children. The latter requires that the preschool teacher both listens to and interacts with the children to ensure that they have actual agency in the teaching situation (Brodin Olsson & Kultti, 2022).
When the Swedish Education Act (SFS 2010:800) came into force and preschools became part of the general school system, the concept of teaching was implicitly included (year 2010) in the Preschool Curriculum (Doverborg et al., 2013). The aim was to achieve a uniform conceptual framework for the school system, which has included preschools since 2010. However, it took time to implement the concept of teaching into preschool practices. Although the concept of teaching was included in the Education Act (SFS 2010:800), it was not explicitly stated in the 1998 Preschool Curriculum. The concept of teaching was not explicitly stated until the 2018 Preschool Curriculum (Lpfö18), probably due to the fact that teaching in preschools can take place both in planned and spontaneous ways.
The present thesis combines the youngest children’s agency with preschool teaching practice. It also combines educational research and childhood sociology. These two perspectives form the basis of the research field known as Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC). The concept of children’s agency is based on sociology of childhood research (Kampmann, 2003; Lager, 2021; Mayall, 1994; Mayall, 2002; Qvortrup, 2011).
Research on work-integrated learning at University West is characterised by the fact that it is carried out in collaboration with the surrounding society and aims to demonstrate the learning of professionals in working life. Research in the field of work-integrated learning focuses on the relationship between learning, knowledge development and working life. In order to promote professional development, it is crucial that researchers and professionals meet to jointly reflect on and develop knowledge and understanding (Hedrén, 2022; Seitl, 2018).
Aim and research questions
The overall aim of the thesis is to contribute knowledge about how preschool teachers and other pedagogical staff understand the concepts of children’s agency and teaching in relation to the context of preschools.The study assumes that a preschool department constitutes an activity system within which the preschool teachers’ professional duties are subject to both opportunities and limitations, which affect how the teachers promote and/or hamper the children’s agency. Based on the overall aim of the thesis, four research questions have been formulated, which have guided the research process.The research questions are:• How do preschool teachers and other pedagogical staff define teaching and the concept of children’s agency?• How do preschool teachers organise and conduct their teaching?• How is children’s agency expressed in teaching sessions?• How do preschool teachers and other pedagogical staff learn and acquire knowledge about teaching and children’s agency?
Theoretical framework
The theoretical framework of this thesis consists of the third generation of Cultural-Historical Activity Theory (CHAT) (Engeström, 2015; 2016). Central concepts in this theory are communication, mediated tools and artefacts. The concept of learning is discussed from the point of view that learning is the individual’s own process in which participation in a practice creates conditions for both the individual’s and the collective’s learning. In an activity theoretical approach symbols (sociohistorical artefacts) and gestures (a cultural perspective) are important tools which, if they are understood, can become mediated tools ix(Engeström, 2015). For younger children, objects that inspire a sense of safety, so-called transitional objects, can function as mediating tools. In their study, Chang-Kredl et al. (2024) underline the role of transitional objects for children’s well-being.
This thesis highlights how preschool teachers respond to children’s questions and what kind of dialogue preschool teachers use in the teaching sessions. Three types of dialogue are identified, namely the monologic dialogue, the quasi-authentic dialogue, and the authentic dialogue (cf. Dysthe, 1996). It is important to remember that every child needs support to learn how to answer questions (Dysthe, 1996; Wank, 2021).
In this thesis, teaching in preschool and children’s agency are studied in two departments in one preschool. Each department is regarded as an activity system where traditions, contradictions and working methods are in constant motion (Nilsson & Alnervik, 2015). One type of contradiction created in these two activity systems is found in relation to didactic decisions, where each department has its own specific conditions, as well as implicit and explicit rules.
Method
In the present thesis, an observational study has been conducted, followed by a thematic analysis. Video observations are made of the teaching provided by the preschool teachers. It is challenging to capture how children’s agency is understood and used during preschool teaching. Video as an observation method is considered to provide the best possible conditions for capturing children’s agency during actual teaching sessions. Video observation makes it possible to study the interaction between teachers and children (Flewitt, 2006; Heath, et al., 2010). The video-stimulated reflection (VSR) method was conducted in three steps, called VSR 1, VSR 2 and VSR 3, and enabled more teachers, in addition to the teacher directly involved in the video-recorded teaching session, to participate in the study (cf. Cutrim Schmid, 2011). VSR 1 involved the preschool teacher delivering the studied teaching session and the researcher. VSR 2 involved the same persons as VSR 1, plus the preschool teacher’s teams (those working in the department). VSR 3 involved the same persons as VSR 2, plus the preschool’s principal. Upon completion of the first analysis, a meeting was organised during which the researcher presented the analysis and carried out a second interview to receive the participants’ feedback.
Ethical considerations guide the entire research process. Children should have the opportunity to participate on their own terms and in accordance with their understanding. The researcher applied the principle that it was her responsibility to interact with the children and to take the role as an adult wanting to take part in the children’s world (cf. James & James, 2008).
Results
The results are presented in three themes, and each chapter is based on empirical data from two studies, named as study A and study B. In the first theme, How are the concepts of teaching and children’s agency understood? the focus in on teaching. The concept of children’s agency is problematised in the light of how it is understood and discussed by the preschool teachers and their colleagues in relation to teaching. How children’s agency is expressed in teaching is described in the second theme, Children’s agency in teaching sessions. How work-integrated learning is made possible is shown in the third theme, Work-integrated learning through participation in a professional practice, which also presents existing challenges.
The first theme shows that the participants in the study emphasise that they assume an active role in teaching. In this theme children’s agency is related to the preschool’s structure and organisation, and smaller groups of children as well as a playful learning approach are seen as positive for children’s agency. It is also beneficial that adults coordinate their perspective with that of the children during teaching sessions. In the absence of such coordination the children’s agency tends to be reduced.
The second theme shows that teachers and children are influenced by each other and that children’s agency is related to how they can influence their situation. In the described teaching sessions, it is shown that children are inspired by each other and that they were given room to act with their bodies. The theme shows that children’s participation and influence are central aspects of how children are offered agency during teaching. In the sub-theme Artefacts, interaction, participation and children’s agency, it is shown how preschool teachers ask questions that give children the opportunity to achieve a shared understanding of what is happening during the teaching. This sub-theme highlights that the concepts of power and resistance are also central aspects of children’s agency. In the sub-theme Children’s participation in discussions promotes children’s agency, it is shown that when the preschool teacher addresses the individual child during the teaching his or her goal can be to either correct the child or coordinate his or her perspective with the child’s perspective. In cases where the preschool teacher addresses an individual child to coordinate perspectives this action promotes the child’s agency. Conversely, the child’s agency is reduced when the preschool teacher corrects the child’s actions. This theme highlights that the children’s agency is enhanced when the preschool teacher asks questions of an authentic nature.
The third theme shows that the preschool teachers’ education is believed to have contributed to their understanding of how they can promote children’s agency during teaching. Continuing education also takes place within the organisation through collegial learning, for example participation in learning groups. Collegial learning is beneficial when people with the same education discuss a common content. When people with different educational backgrounds discuss these issues, learning takes place more at the individual level. Preschool teachers emphasise that they benefit the most from discussions with people having the same education as themselves. The empirical data show that the discussions between the researcher and the teachers have generated new insights for the teachers. From a research perspective focusing on work-integrated learning the study shows that there are substantial advantages to using video as a documentation method, in combination with reflective discussions.
Discussion and conclusion
In the past, teaching in preschool settings was the subject of criticism and debate (Bergmark & Westman, 2022; Melker et al., 2018; Persson et al., 2022). At present, preschool teaching, both in spontaneous situations and in planned form, is considered to be a natural and integral part of the preschool curriculum (SKOLFS 2018:50; SKOLFS 2025:23). The present thesis shows that children’s agency in relation to preschool teaching is not entirely unproblematic. If children’s agency is to be enabled in a teaching situation, the preschool teacher must be sensitive to the child’s response and navigate between the group and the individual. This requirement may cause a didactic conflict if a ready-made programme is being used for the preschool’s teaching. In order to avoid negative consequences that hamper children’s agency, it is crucial that the teacher uses their professional knowledge and, when necessary, breaks any negative rules of a fixed educational programme, which is often marketed as resting on a scientific basis and proven experience. The reflective discussions, held between the preschool teachers and the researcher about what happens during teaching and how children’s agency can be understood, have generated an increased shared understanding of the complexity of teaching and how children’s agency can be expressed.
The theoretical framework, third-generation Activity theory, offers the opportunity to study teaching in relation to an activity system. In this thesis, children’s opportunities for agency in each activity system, as observed in teaching situations in study A and study B, respectively, are discussed. The choice to show how the activity systems interact with each other is made to show how children’s opportunities for agency in preschool teaching practice can be expressed in two activities and activity systems (cf. Berglund, 2009; Engeström, 2001; Nilsson & Alnervik, 2015; Hakkarainen, 1999). The teaching sessions are unique, but also provide common examples of how teaching can be expressed in preschool. A particular pedagogical challenge concerns the difficulties in creating dialogues between preschool teachers and children, as well as between the children (cf. Wank, 2021).
Since the present study shows that children’s agency can be promoted by using mediating tools and artefacts during teaching sessions, it is also relevant to investigate the structures that surround the studied activity system, i.e. teaching practice in preschool. Previous research highlights that children’s agency in teaching is dependent on the teacher’s approach and the framework of the activities. Agency depends on the structures surrounding the activities (Giddens 1979; James & James, 2008).
Expanded learning means that participants in an activity system alter their actions based on new experiences and knowledge, but should not be interpreted as automatically leading to improvement work (Alnervik, 2013). In recurring discussions, researchers and preschool teachers have exchanged experiences and created knowledge about how children’s agency can be expressed in preschool teaching. These discussions have been conducted during video-stimulated reflections and feedback analyses. The abductive approach, where theory and empirical data meet, has led to an oscillation between children’s agency as a scientific concept and confirmation by the study participants of the reasonable nature of the analysis. In research focusing on work-integrated learning an abductive approach contributes to innovative thinking for the researcher, and to development of practice where preschool teachers and researchers learn from and with each other. Innovative thinking is in line with how work-integrated learning is viewed at University West, where an interprofessional approach to developing new practice is in focus (Sandblad, 2021; Truong, 2024).
Reflection is found to be important for work-integrated learning to be expressed. Through reflection, new insights are created that lead to new knowledge that can lead to change (Hedrén, 2022; Sandblad, 2021; Truong, 2024). In relation to the present thesis, a change is shown to take place when the preschool teachers state that the study has contributed insights to them individually, as well as to their teams collectively, thus providing everyone with an increased awareness of the concept of agency. The participation of preschool teachers in the study has not only increased their individual knowledge, it has also contributed to the working group’s collective learning (cf. Engeström, 2016).
The concept of trustworthiness includes explaining approaches, methodological considerations and ethical positions to the reader (cf. Weed, 2008). The meaning of the concept of trustworthiness has been a key word in the research process. In the present thesis, children’s participation in research has guided the choice of method. The position is that children should be offered the opportunity to participate in research based on their conditions and needs, and that they should have the opportunity to participate on their own volition (Menning & Kampmann, 2021; Swedish Research Council, 2017). However, when the children are as young as one to three years old, they obviously cannot understand the meaning and implications of participating in research. Instead of obtaining their informed consent, one must strive to make them feel comfortable in the research situation. To this end, my ambition was to be a natural part of the children’s group, talking to them and in particular letting them tell me freely about their preschool and everyday life. This approach is in line with how Engdahl (2014) acted during her fieldwork. A possible problem with this approach could be that the children view me as a teacher in their group, although I do not believe this happened. Instead, the children told me about what they were doing or invited me to play with them. By participating in the children’s playing activities and speaking with them, encouraging them to talk about their experiences and actions, I was given the opportunity to take part in their perspectives (cf. Bird, 1994; Corsaro, 2011). In order not to enter the preschool teacher’s role during the fieldwork, inspiration was drawn from how Dysthe (1996) problematises the dilemma of going from teacher to researcher, which includes adopting an analytical view of one’s research and not entering into the role as a teacher. Throughout the research process, I continuously reflected on my role as a preschool researcher with a background as a preschool teacher. My background contributed to the choice of study object, in particular my ambition to highlight the complexity of the preschool teacher’s professional assignment.