Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Bedömnings-, dokumentationspraktiker och pedagogiska identiteter
University West, Department of Social and Behavioural Studies, Division for Educational Science and Languages. (BUV)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9820-0729
Göteborgs universitet, Institutionen för pedagogik och specialpedagogik, Utbildningsvetenskapliga fakulteten.
Göteborgs universitet, Institutionen för pedagogik och specialpedagogik, Utbildningsvetenskapliga fakulteten.
2015 (Swedish)In: Educare - Vetenskapliga skrifter, ISSN 1653-1868, Vol. 2015, no 2, 206-233 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

When competition and an increasing level of marketisation characterises school life, the number of evaluations and the level of control has grown out of proportion. Through comparisons, assessments and ranking systems, also called ‘the terrors of performativity’ according to Ball (2003) commercial agents have gained influence over practices of assessment and documentation within the education system. Increased demands on pupils’ and parents’ participation and a belief that written documentation will lead to better results has caused an extensive use of different web based tools like Unikum. With the point of departure in a collected material of more than a hundred Individual Educations Plans (IEP) where commercial web based tools have been used, we make an analysis with Basil Bernstein’s (1996, 2000) concepts Pedagogic Identity, and Instructional and Regulative discourse in relation to expectations and constructions manifest in the plans. The results show that all four identities are expressed in the plans however, with an emphasis on a neo-liberal identity. We discuss the results in relation to the instructional and regulative discourses. The conclusion is that the tools both shape and determine possible identities and possible discourses in the web based interaction between children, parents and teachers.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Malmö, 2015. Vol. 2015, no 2, 206-233 p.
Keyword [en]
Identity, Individual Education Plans, pedagogic identity
National Category
Educational Sciences
Research subject
SOCIAL SCIENCE, Educational science; Child and Youth studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-7715OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-7715DiVA: diva2:818237
Available from: 2015-06-08 Created: 2015-06-08 Last updated: 2016-02-09Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Asplund Carlsson, Maj
By organisation
Division for Educational Science and Languages
In the same journal
Educare - Vetenskapliga skrifter
Educational Sciences

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 201 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • harvard1
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf