Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Shared Decision-Making after Implementation of the Chronic Care Model (CCM)—An Evaluative Approach
Buskerud & Vestfold University College,The Centre for Women’s, Family and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences,, Kongsberg, Norway..
Buskerud & Vestfold University College,The Centre for Women’s, Family and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences,, Kongsberg, Norway..
University West, Department of Nursing, Health and Culture, Division of Nursing.ORCID iD: 0000-0003-0305-8649
Buskerud & Vestfold University College,The Centre for Women’s, Family and Child Health, Faculty of Health Sciences,, Kongsberg, Norway..
2014 (English)In: Open Journal of Nursing, ISSN 2162-5336, Vol. 04, no 12, p. 824-835Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Background: In paternalistic models, healthcare providers’ responsibility is to decide what is best for patients. The main concern is that such models fail to respect patient autonomy and do not promote patient responsibility. Aim: To evaluate mental healthcare team members’ perceptions of their own role in encouraging elderly persons to participate in shared decision-making after implementation of the CCM. The CCM is not an explanatory theory, but an evidence-based guideline and synthesis of best available evidence. Methods: Data were collected from two teams that took part in a focus group interview, and the transcript was analysed by means of qualitative thematic analysis. Results: One overall theme emerged—Preventing the violation of human dignity based on three themes, namely, Changing understanding and attitudes, Increasing depressed elderly persons’ autonomy and Clarifying the mental healthcare team coordinator’s role and responsibility. The results of this study reveal that until recently, paternalism has been the dominant decision-making model within healthcare, without any apparent consideration of the patient perspective. Community mental healthcare can be improved by shared decision-making in which team members initiate a dialogue focusing on patient participation to prevent the violation of human dignity. However, in order to determine how best to empower the patient, team members need expert knowledge and intuition.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Scientific Research Publishing, 2014. Vol. 04, no 12, p. 824-835
Keywords [en]
Chronic Care Model, Decision-Making, Depressive Ill Health, Focus Group Interviews, Participation, Team
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
NURSING AND PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE, Public health science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-7053DOI: 10.4236/ojn.2014.412088OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-7053DiVA, id: diva2:767581
Available from: 2014-12-01 Created: 2014-12-01 Last updated: 2015-03-20Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full text

Authority records BETA

Berggren, Ingela

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Berggren, Ingela
By organisation
Division of Nursing
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 107 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf