Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Den förhandlade makten: Kulturella värdekonflikter i den svenska skolan
University West, Department of Economics and IT, Divison of Law, Economics, Statistics and Politics.
2011 (Swedish)Doctoral thesis, monograph (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

This dissertation argues that, in order to understand how teachers in compulsory Swedish schools deal with what they regard to be cultural value conflicts, an important aspect is negotiations about d... merefinitions between teachers, pupils and parents, this directing focus towards power relations in the actual schools rather than formal decision making procedures. The aim is to elaborate a theory on the foundation of power theories that provides an understanding of the negotiation process and its effects in relation to cultural value conflicts. In relation to the four faces of power (decision making, agenda setting, preference shaping, and Foucauldian power analytics) the dissertation views the first three aspects as the force that makes the negotiation come about. For analyzing the actual power structure of the negotiation as well as the effects of the negotiation, it relies on a Foucauldian perspective. The dissertation views the process when the definitions come about as a framing process, but connected to a Foucauldian perspective rather than an agenda setting perspective. It therefore focuses on normalization and disciplinarian processes. The dissertation identifies five different frames in earlier research: individual sphere, public sphere, religious sphere, sexuality and gender sphere, and science sphere. It is argued that those spheres are abstract entities that provide particularities with a meaning by including them in existing story lines. By doing so, they also provide possible solutions, point out individuals or groups as authorities, and decide the hierarchy of ethical and normative goals. It is further argued that, in order to understand the negotiation, insights into the overall context of Swedish schools are important, and especially the structures vertical autonomy (the teacher's dependence on the state), horizontal autonomy (the teacher's dependence on parents and pupils), teacher role, and ideas about cultural diversity and ethnicity. Long semi structured interviews have been made with a total of 39 teachers from four different schools. Three different types of questions are studied: societal value questions (as democratic values and opinions on sexuality), knowledge questions and questions about pupils´ behaviour in classroom. The findings show that there is no hegemonic discourse in Swedish schools regarding the issues studied; similar questions are frequently framed differently by different teachers and on different schools. The findings of the empirical study further indicate that many negotiations ends up with the individual frame (this is the case for all three different types of questions). It is argued that this individualization reduces potential conflicts and is therefore preferred when the actors want to connect a question to different speheres. It is also argued that the results of the framing depends on power relations: if there is a societal consensus about a phenomenon (e.g. democracy), teachers are more reluctant to frame it as an individual question. If there is no such consensus (e.g. opinions on homosexuality) the teachers are more prone to direct it to the individual sphere. 

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Stockholm: Statsvetenskapliga institutionen, Göteborgs universitet , 2011. , 247 p.
Series
Studier i politik, ISSN 0346-5942 ; 127
Keyword [en]
Swedish schools, value conflicts, culture, power, Foucault, framing, negotiation, language, spheres, individualization, administration reforms
National Category
Political Science
Research subject
SOCIAL SCIENCE, Political science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-3856ISBN: 978-91-89246-53-9 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-3856DiVA: diva2:457516
Public defence
2011-11-18, Göteborgs Universitet, Universitetsbyggnaden, Vasaparken, Göteborg, 13:15
Available from: 2011-11-22 Created: 2011-11-18 Last updated: 2011-11-22Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Avhandlingen

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Sjögren, Fredrik
By organisation
Divison of Law, Economics, Statistics and Politics
Political Science

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

Total: 158 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf