Open this publication in new window or tab >>2011 (English)In: BMC Public Health, E-ISSN 1471-2458, Vol. 11, p. 809-Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Background:
There appears to be an obvious gap between a medical and patient adherence perspective.
Deviating from a medication prescription could be regarded as fairly irrational, but with respect to patients' goals and/or concerns it could be seen as understandable. Thus, the aim was to elucidate adherence reasoning in relation to asthma medication.
Methods:
This was a qualitative study; data collection and analysis procedures were conducted according to Grounded Theory methodology. Eighteen persons, aged 22 with asthma and regular asthma medication treatment, were interviewed.
Results:
The emerged theoretical model illustrated that adherence to asthma medication was motivated by three foci, all directed towards a desired outcome in terms of a functional day as desired by the patient. Apromotive focus was associated with the ambition to achieve a positive asthma outcome by being adherent either to the received prescription or to a self-adjusted dosage. A preventive focuswas intended to ensure avoidance of a negative asthma outcome either by sticking to the prescription or by preventively overusing the medication. A permissive focus was associated with unstructured adherence behaviour in which medication intake was primarily triggered by asthma symptoms.
Conclusions:
As all participants had consciously adopted functioning medication tactics that directed them
towards the desired goal of a functional day. In an effort to bridge the gap between a patient- and a medical adherence perspective, patients need support in defining their desired functionality and guidance in developing a person-based medication tactic.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
London: BioMed Central, 2011
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
NURSING AND PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE, Nursing science
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-3944 (URN)10.1186/1471-2458-11-809 (DOI)
2012-01-022012-01-022023-08-28Bibliographically approved