Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Gender differences in L2 motivation: A reassessment
University West, Department of Social and Behavioural Studies, Division for Educational Science and Languages.ORCID iD: 0000-0001-7789-9032
2011 (English)In: Gender Gap: causes, experiences & effects / [ed] Davies, Samuel A., New York: Nova Science , 2011, p. 81-101Chapter in book (Other academic)
Abstract [en]

Along with aptitude, motivation is the primary determiner of learning outcomes in second language (L2) learning. Widely regarded as an activity especially suited to girls, empirical studies from different sociocultural contexts have, with few exceptions, revealed systematic gender differences in L2 motivation. In particular, gender differences are most apparent in relation to establishing an affinity with other L2 speakers, the ability and willingness to identify with the values associated with L2 ethnolinguistic communities and a lack of ethnocentricity. Together these attributes have been categorized as integrativeness (Gardner, 1985). Explanations for observed gender differences vary and, other than a general recognition of the impact of social norms and gender role expectations, no overarching theoretical explanation has yet been attempted. Given the recent paradigm shift in the conceptualization of L2 motivation from a social psychological approach based on identifications with other groups of speakers, to one based on the learner’s internal identification of a future language speaking ‘self’, a timely opportunity is presented to review previous findings. Following an initial discussion of the paradigm shift in L2 motivation theory and the role of gender in conceptions of the self, the literature on the gender gap in integrativeness is reviewed through the lens of self-related theories. A tentative explanation for observed differences that synthesizes the results of previous research and is theoretically consistent with a self approach is proposed. Drawing on the work of, amongst others, Jordan, Kaplan, Miller, Stiver and Surrey (1991), Markus and Kitayama (1991) and Cross and Madson (1997) it is suggested that gender differences can be understood in relation to processes involving the construction and construal of selves, where the selves of males are characterized by independence whilst those of females emphasize interdependence.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
New York: Nova Science , 2011. p. 81-101
Keywords [en]
Gender differences, Second language learning, Motivation in education
Keywords [sv]
Språkundervisning, Studiemotivation
National Category
Specific Languages
Research subject
HUMANITIES, English
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-2981ISBN: 978-1-61728-292-8 (print)OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-2981DiVA, id: diva2:383190
Available from: 2011-01-04 Created: 2011-01-04 Last updated: 2018-01-12Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

Pre-publication version(251 kB)2262 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 251 kBChecksum SHA-512
04afc6ca4be7540910112e2fde168cbcc34413bc5913b181cb657068d06dd224e79fd007b01b91b505b34f46a555bd5e15e34ea83104dd2c468c485d6a03dece
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Authority records

Henry, Alastair

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Henry, Alastair
By organisation
Division for Educational Science and Languages
Specific Languages

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 2264 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

isbn
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

isbn
urn-nbn
Total: 2552 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf