Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Upper secondary school students’ perspectives on un/fairness in group work assessment
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping (SWE).ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9405-607X
University West, Department of Social and Behavioural Studies, Division for Educational Science and Languages. Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping (SWE).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1391-3346
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping (SWE).ORCID iD: 0000-0003-1194-9708
Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning, Linköping University, Linköping (SWE).ORCID iD: 0000-0002-7117-5620
2024 (English)In: Research Papers in Education, ISSN 0267-1522, E-ISSN 1470-1146, p. 1-22Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Students’ perspectives of un/fairness in group work assessment are known to be related to the issues of varied contributions in group work and how to discern each student’s contribution or knowledge from the group’s joint work. Students’ perceptions of un/fairness in group work assessment are important since it relates to their motivation.

This study aims to investigate upper secondary students’ perspectives on un/fairness in group work assessment. In the study, 129 upper secondary school students in Sweden between the ages of 15 and 16 years participated. The students were interviewed in 33 focus groups. The interviews were thematically analysed.

The study’s findings illustrate how ambition, motivation and friendship relations in groups may vary and cause what students perceive as unfairness. Varied ambitions and motivations among group members also appear to breed situations where group members’ contributions to group work may vary, which also is perceived by students as unfair. Other factors that can contribute to a perception of unfairness are when knowledge levels vary among group members or friendship relations. How un/fairness is perceived also depends on the level at which the assessment is implemented, group or individual level. The greatest experience of unfairness is generated by implementing group assessment.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. p. 1-22
Keywords [en]
Group work assessment; fairness; unfairness; upper secondary school; students’ perspectives
National Category
Pedagogy
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-22232DOI: 10.1080/02671522.2024.2378429ISI: 001271099700001Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85198541790OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-22232DiVA, id: diva2:1889290
Funder
Swedish Research Council, VR 721 2012-5476
Note

CC BY 4.0

Available from: 2024-08-15 Created: 2024-08-15 Last updated: 2025-03-26

Open Access in DiVA

fulltext(877 kB)67 downloads
File information
File name FULLTEXT01.pdfFile size 877 kBChecksum SHA-512
b7c003233e0b942b870a82b2464cdd39f935d1faa4875846f7b67c92c6afb137e45fe688f3d2b2a94d9ffbbd0aa385bb77fb906df544f55ec8f62a4cf801d7b0
Type fulltextMimetype application/pdf

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Forslund Frykedal, Karin

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Forsell, JohanForslund Frykedal, KarinAndersson, PerHammar Chiriac, Eva
By organisation
Division for Educational Science and Languages
In the same journal
Research Papers in Education
Pedagogy

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar
Total: 67 downloads
The number of downloads is the sum of all downloads of full texts. It may include eg previous versions that are now no longer available

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 199 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf