How adolescents' lives were disrupted over the course of the COVID-19 pandemic: A longitudinal investigation in 12 cultural groups in 9 nations from March 2020 to July 2022.Show others and affiliations
2024 (English)In: Development and psychopathology (Print), ISSN 0954-5794, E-ISSN 1469-2198, p. 1-17Article in journal (Refereed) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]
It is unclear how much adolescents' lives were disrupted throughout the COVID-19 pandemic or what risk factors predicted such disruption. To answer these questions, 1,080 adolescents in 9 nations were surveyed 5 times from March 2020 to July 2022. Rates of adolescent COVID-19 life disruption were stable and high. Adolescents who, compared to their peers, lived in nations with higher national COVID-19 death rates, lived in nations with less stringent COVID-19 mitigation strategies, had less confidence in their government's response to COVID-19, complied at higher rates with COVID-19 control measures, experienced the death of someone they knew due to COVID-19, or experienced more internalizing, externalizing, and smoking problems reported more life disruption due to COVID-19 during part or all of the pandemic. Additionally, when, compared to their typical levels of functioning, adolescents experienced spikes in national death rates, experienced less stringent COVID-19 mitigation measures, experienced less confidence in government response to the COVID-19 pandemic, complied at higher rates with COVID-19 control measures, experienced more internalizing problems, or smoked more at various periods during the pandemic, they also experienced more COVID-19 life disruption. Collectively, these findings provide new insights that policymakers can use to prevent the disruption of adolescents' lives in future pandemics.
Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2024. p. 1-17
Keywords [en]
COVID-19, adolescence, cross-cultural, longitudinal, risk factors
National Category
Public Health, Global Health and Social Medicine
Research subject
Child and Youth studies
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-21226DOI: 10.1017/S0954579423001621ISI: 001149690300001PubMedID: 38273765Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85184167923OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-21226DiVA, id: diva2:1853541
Note
CC-BY 4.0
This research has been funded by NICHD grant RO1-HD054805 and Fogarty International Center grant RO3-TW008141. This research also was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH/NICHD, USA, and the Centre for the Evaluation of Development Policies at the Institute for Fiscal Studies, London, UK, funded by the European Research Council (ERC) under the Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (grant agreement No 695300-HKADeC-ERC-2015-AdG).
2024-04-222024-04-222025-02-20