Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Older patients’ recovery following intensive care: A follow-up study with the RAIN questionnaire
University of Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg.
University of Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg.
University of Gothenburg, Institute of Health and Care Sciences at Sahlgrenska Academy, Göteborg.
University West, Department of Health Sciences, Section for nursing - undergraduate level. (LOV)ORCID iD: 0000-0001-9423-9378
2021 (English)In: Intensive & Critical Care Nursing, ISSN 0964-3397, E-ISSN 1532-4036, Vol. 65, article id 103038Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

The aim was to investigate older patient recovery (65 years+) up to two years following discharge from an intensive care unit (ICU) using the Recovery After Intensive Care (RAIN) instrument and to correlate RAIN with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD).Methods: An explorative and descriptive longitudinal design was used. Eighty-two patients answered RAIN and HAD at least twice following discharge. Demographic and clinical data were collected frompatient records.Results: Recovery after the ICU was relatively stable and good for older patients at the four data collection points. There was little variation on the RAIN subscales over time. The greatest recovery improvement was found in existential ruminations from 2 to 24 months. A patient that could look forward and those with supportive relatives had the highest scores at all four measurements. Having lower financial situation was correlated to poorer recovery and was significant at 24 months. The RAIN and HAD instruments showed significant correlations, except for the revaluation of life subscale, which is not an aspect in HAD.Conclusion: The RAIN instrument shows to be a good measurement for all dimensions of recovery, including existential dimensions, which are not covered by any other instrument.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2021. Vol. 65, article id 103038
Keywords [en]
Follow-up, Intensive care, Nursing, RAIN questionnaire, Recovery, Validation
National Category
Nursing Anesthesiology and Intensive Care
Research subject
NURSING AND PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE, Nursing science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-16429DOI: 10.1016/j.iccn.2021.103038ISI: 000661431800017Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85103235462OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-16429DiVA, id: diva2:1544233
Available from: 2021-04-14 Created: 2021-04-14 Last updated: 2022-04-04Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Karlsson, Veronika

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Karlsson, Veronika
By organisation
Section for nursing - undergraduate level
In the same journal
Intensive & Critical Care Nursing
NursingAnesthesiology and Intensive Care

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 159 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf