Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Process sustainability evaluation for manufacturing of a component with the 6R application
University West, Department of Engineering Science, Research Enviroment Production Technology West. GKN Aerospace Engine Systems AB, Flygmotorvagen 1, Trollhattan, 46138, Sweden.ORCID iD: 0000-0002-2146-7916
University of Kentucky, Institute for Sustainable Manufacturing (ISM), Lexington, KY 40506, United States.
University West, Department of Engineering Science, Division of Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing.
University West, Department of Engineering Science, Division of Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing.
Show others and affiliations
2019 (English)In: Procedia Manufacturing, E-ISSN 2351-9789, Vol. 33, p. 546-553Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Sustainability in manufacturing can be evaluated at product, process and system levels. The 6R methodology for sustainability enhancement in manufacturing processes includes: reduced use of materials, energy, water and other resources; reusing of products/components; recovery and recycling of materials/components; remanufacturing of products; and redesigning of products to utilize recovered materials/resources. Although manufacturing processes can be evaluated by their productivity, quality and cost, process sustainability assessment makes it a complete evaluation. This paper presents a 6R-based evaluation method for sustainable manufacturing in terms of specific metrics within six major metrics clusters: environmental impact, energy consumption, waste management, cost, resource utilization and society/personnel health/operational safety. Manufacturing processes such as casting, welding, turning, milling, drilling, grinding, etc., can be evaluated using this methodology. A case study for machining processes is presented as an example based on the proposed metrics. © 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2019. Vol. 33, p. 546-553
National Category
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-14467DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2019.04.068Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85068575451OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-14467DiVA, id: diva2:1356393
Conference
Conference of 16th Global Conference on Sustainable Manufacturing, GCSM 2018 ; Conference Date: 2 October 2018 Through 4 October 2018
Funder
Knowledge FoundationAvailable from: 2019-10-01 Created: 2019-10-01 Last updated: 2019-10-02

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Bonilla Hernández, Ana EstherBeno, TomasFredriksson, Claes

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Bonilla Hernández, Ana EstherBeno, TomasFredriksson, Claes
By organisation
Research Enviroment Production Technology WestDivision of Subtractive and Additive Manufacturing
In the same journal
Procedia Manufacturing
Production Engineering, Human Work Science and Ergonomics

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 6 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf