Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Exploration and preferential ranking of patient benefits of medical devices: a new and generic instrument for health economic assessments
Nordic Health Economics AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nordic Health Economics AB, Gothenburg, Sweden. Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Scandinavian. Surgical Outcomes Research Group, Sahlgrenska University Hospital/Östra, Gothenburg, Sweden.
University West, Department of Social and Behavioural Studies, Division of Psychology, Pedagogy and Sociology. Nordic Health Economics AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nordic Health Economics AB, Gothenburg, Sweden.
2017 (English)In: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, ISSN 0266-4623, E-ISSN 1471-6348, Vol. 33, no 4, 463-471 p.Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Objectives: For medical devices, benefits other than direct clinical effects may have a large impact on the patients' well-being, but a standardized method for measuring these benefits is unavailable. The objective was to explore potential patient benefits provided by medical devices, and to assess the relative preferences of these benefits in the general Swedish population.Methods: To identify attributes of patient benefit, healthcare personnel within a wide range of disease areas were interviewed. The generalized attributes were then validated among healthcare personnel, patient organizations, and manufacturers; in two pilot studies in the general population; and in two rounds of cognitive interviews. The general population's preferences of the attributes were measured with a usability-tested questionnaire in a final responding sample of 3,802 individuals, representative of the Swedish population.Results: Twenty attributes were identified, encompassing aspects of integrity, sense of security, social participation, and convenience. When measuring the relative preferences, the response rate was 37.0 percent, and the results showed that the attributes with the highest preferences concerned reliability, reduced need for assistance, and sense of control of the illness/disability.Conclusions: A set of twenty attributes of patient benefit relevant to users of medical devices was identified and validated. A questionnaire for patient-reported assessment of the benefits provided by a medical device was developed, based on the attributes. The questionnaire, designated MedTech20, provides a generic measurement method for the evaluation of medical devices used in a wide range of diseases/disabilities.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
Cambridge University Press , 2017. Vol. 33, no 4, 463-471 p.
Keyword [en]
Medical device, Patient satisfaction, Surveys and questionnaires, Health technology assessment, Healthcare evaluation mechanisms
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
NURSING AND PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE, Nursing science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-11798DOI: 10.1017/S0266462317000848Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85033376539OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-11798DiVA: diva2:1159653
Note

Published online: 25 October 2017

Available from: 2017-11-23 Created: 2017-11-23 Last updated: 2017-12-18Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records BETA

Ingelgård, Anders

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Ingelgård, Anders
By organisation
Division of Psychology, Pedagogy and Sociology
In the same journal
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 1 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf