Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
What to do with all these Bayes factors: How to make Bayesian reports in deception research more informative
Högskolan Väst, Institutionen för individ och samhälle, Avdelningen för psykologi, pedagogik och sociologi.ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5285-5321
Centrum Wiskunde & Informatica, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
2019 (engelsk)Inngår i: Legal and Criminological Psychology, ISSN 1355-3259, E-ISSN 2044-8333Artikkel i tidsskrift (Fagfellevurdert) Epub ahead of print
Abstract [en]

Bayes factors quantify the evidence in support of the null (absence of an effect) or the alternative hypothesis (presence of an effect). Based on commonly used cut-offs, Bayes factors between 1/3 and 3 are interpreted as evidentially weak, and one typically concludes there is an absence of evidence. In this commentary on Warmelink, Subramanian, Tkacheva, and McLatchie (Legal Criminol Psychol 24, 2019, 258), we discuss how a Bayesian report can be made more informative. Firstly, this implies a departure from the labels provided by commonly used cut-offs when reporting Bayes factors. Instead, we encourage researchers to report the value of the Bayes factors, or to convert these values into nominal support for the hypotheses. Secondly, researchers can provide recommendations to design follow-up studies by examining the posterior distribution of the magnitude of the effect size. Lastly, we show how individual Bayes factors can be evaluated in the context of large-scale meta-analyses. © 2019 British Psychological Society

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2019.
Emneord [en]
deception; effect size; follow up; human; meta analysis; note; sample size
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP, Psykologi
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-14915DOI: 10.1111/lcrp.12162Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85076291391OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-14915DiVA, id: diva2:1389179
Tilgjengelig fra: 2020-01-29 Laget: 2020-01-29 Sist oppdatert: 2020-01-29bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Forlagets fulltekstScopus

Personposter BETA

Mac Giolla, Erik

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Mac Giolla, Erik
Av organisasjonen
I samme tidsskrift
Legal and Criminological Psychology

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric

doi
urn-nbn
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf