Endre søk
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
The same conflicts but different framing: The Middle Eastern conflicts in Religious Education and Civics
Högskolan Väst, Institutionen för individ och samhälle, Avd för utbildningsvetenskap och språk. (BUV)ORCID-id: 0000-0002-5192-6327
2019 (engelsk)Konferansepaper, Oral presentation with published abstract (Annet vitenskapelig)
Abstract [en]

The conflicts in the Middle East are not confined to a geographical area but have both a global and a local dimension. International conflicts, crises and acts of terrorism have consequences in the classroom practice, partly because current events are part of the content in social studies subjects, but partly because an increasing number of pupils have personal experiences and/or personal views on different aspects of these conflicts, also in relation to nationalist, xenophobic and islamophobic discourses. The overall aim in this paper is to investigate and compare how the Middle Eastern conflicts and related topics are raised within Religious Education and Civics. Are there differences in content and ways of talking in Religious Education compared to Civics and, if so, how? What implications have different subject framings for discourses and perspectives and hence, what becomes possible to learn? The study is based on participatory classroom observations of Religious Education and Civics at six Swedish upper secondary schools. Interviews with 8 teachers and 15 focus group interviews with 51 pupils have been conducted. The preliminary analyses indicate that migration, terrorism, antisemitism, islamophobia and swedishness were major themes raised in relation to the conflicts in both subjects. Experiences of pupils largely affected the classroom discourse. However, there were differences between how the conflicts were framed and discussed, but also the role of religion as an explanatory factor. In Civics, the conflict perspective was central but remained unproblematised. In the Religious Education, the conflict perspective was largely absent.

sted, utgiver, år, opplag, sider
2019.
HSV kategori
Forskningsprogram
SAMHÄLLSVETENSKAP, Utbildningsvetenskap
Identifikatorer
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-14825OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-14825DiVA, id: diva2:1381952
Konferanse
NOFA7, Nordic Conference on Teaching and Learning in Curriculum Subjects, Stockholm, Sweden, 13-15 May, 2019.
Tilgjengelig fra: 2019-12-30 Laget: 2019-12-30 Sist oppdatert: 2020-09-21bibliografisk kontrollert

Open Access i DiVA

Fulltekst mangler i DiVA

Andre lenker

Länk till abstract

Person

Flensner, Karin K

Søk i DiVA

Av forfatter/redaktør
Flensner, Karin K
Av organisasjonen

Søk utenfor DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

urn-nbn

Altmetric

urn-nbn
Totalt: 148 treff
RefereraExporteraLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Referera
Referensformat
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Annet format
Fler format
Språk
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Annet språk
Fler språk
Utmatningsformat
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf