Change search
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf
Emergency Medical Response in Mass Casualty Tunnel Incidents: with Emphasis on Prehospital Care
Department of Nursing, Umeå University (SWE).
University West, Department of Health Sciences, Section for nursing - graduate level. Department of Nursing, Umeå University (SWE). (LOV)ORCID iD: 0000-0002-0871-0475
Department of Nursing, Umeå University (SWE).
Department of Nursing, Umeå University (SWE).
2020 (English)In: Journal of Human Security, E-ISSN 1835-3800, Vol. 16, no 1, p. 3-15Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]

Responding to mass casualty incidents in a tunnel environment is problematic not least from a prehospital emergency medical services (EMS) perspective. The aim of this review was to 1) categorize preconditions for emergency response in tunnel environments based on Haddon's matrix and 2) identify specific EMS knowledge of providing prehospital care. Twenty eight articles, reports and book chapters were selected for further analysis. Firstly, sorting the data from each included article was done according to Haddon's matrix. The result covers human factors, technical factors, physical environmental factors and socioeconomic environmental factors all related to preconditions for emergency response. To describe the EMS's knowledge the data was also sorted according to command and safety, communication, assessment, and triage treatment and transport, also known as CSCATT. Few studies, especially of high quality, actually provide detailed information regarding emergency response to tunnel incidents and those that do, often have a main focus on management by the rescue service. While many incidents studied were caused by fires in tunnels, thus requiring rescue service in action, the subsequent EMS response issues that have taken place appear to have been given limited attention. To optimize the survival rates and health of the injured, as well as to provide a safe and effective work environment for the emergency services, there is a need to explore the event phase.

Place, publisher, year, edition, pages
2020. Vol. 16, no 1, p. 3-15
Keywords [en]
emergency medical care; emergency response; major incidents; mass casualty incident; tunnels; prehospital care
National Category
Nursing
Research subject
NURSING AND PUBLIC HEALTH SCIENCE, Nursing science
Identifiers
URN: urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-15128DOI: 10.12924/johs2020.16010003Scopus ID: 2-s2.0-85089525831OAI: oai:DiVA.org:hv-15128DiVA, id: diva2:1458610
Available from: 2020-08-17 Created: 2020-08-17 Last updated: 2024-04-25Bibliographically approved

Open Access in DiVA

No full text in DiVA

Other links

Publisher's full textScopus

Authority records

Eklund, Annika

Search in DiVA

By author/editor
Eklund, Annika
By organisation
Section for nursing - graduate level
In the same journal
Journal of Human Security
Nursing

Search outside of DiVA

GoogleGoogle Scholar

doi
urn-nbn

Altmetric score

doi
urn-nbn
Total: 44 hits
CiteExportLink to record
Permanent link

Direct link
Cite
Citation style
  • apa
  • ieee
  • modern-language-association-8th-edition
  • vancouver
  • Other style
More styles
Language
  • de-DE
  • en-GB
  • en-US
  • fi-FI
  • nn-NO
  • nn-NB
  • sv-SE
  • Other locale
More languages
Output format
  • html
  • text
  • asciidoc
  • rtf