Open this publication in new window or tab >>2018 (English)In: Journal of social service research, ISSN 0148-8376, E-ISSN 1540-7314, Vol. 44, no 4, p. 494-508Article in journal (Refereed) Published
Abstract [en]
Previous research emphasizes the need for reflection in complex, dynamic practices, like social work.However, increased governance of the public sector and welfare state has caused a reform, which inturn has affected the layout and conditions of work. Private sector control ideals and ideas from theauditing system have led to a new focus. It is argued that we should subordinate practiceapproaches–characterized by reflection, proven experience, and tacit knowledge–to manual-based treatment, evaluations, and assessments. This study aims at understanding the role ofreflection in social work by investigating its use and valuation by family support social workers.Opportunities and resources for reflection are another focus. Focus group interviews (nD40) wereused to produce data. The need for reflection to conduct highly qualitative social work becameevident. The question is notwhetherto reflect or not, ratherhowthis best can be done, givencurrent time constraints. Reflection was considered a coping mechanism, offering a sense ofprofessional legitimacy. Organizational changes seem to impact on time for reflection. However,when enabling process, learning, and development, it can be argued that reflection is beneficial forseveral parties. Therefore, reflection requires continued emphasis, highlighting its potential benefits.
Keywords
Social work, family support
National Category
Social Work
Research subject
SOCIAL SCIENCE, Social work; Child and Youth studies
Identifiers
urn:nbn:se:hv:diva-12522 (URN)10.1080/01488376.2018.1476300 (DOI)000444568800006 ()2-s2.0-85048800014 (Scopus ID)
Note
Published online: 18 Jun 2018
Funders: Center for Progress in Children's Mental Health (UPH)
2018-06-202018-06-202020-09-02Bibliographically approved